« Who Killed The Electric Car Now Playing On Google Video
The Hard Science Behind Global Warming »

Inaction Vs. Action

Posted: Wednesday, October 18th, 2006 by damnHippy
Tags: Climate Change, Economics

The costs of curbing greenhouse gas emissions today are relatively small when compared with the consequences of doing nothing. The costs of inaction will far outweigh the cost of going green now. It's a choice that we will have to make and the sooner the better.

Climate change inaction will cost trillions » [ABC News]

Digg It | Hugg It | | Report this post

Possibly Related Posts:

Environment groups angry at UN inaction on Mt Everest
Environmentalists are pissed that the UN has decided not to add Mt. Everest to it's list of endangered places. Apparently the glaciers surround the....

Ozone is recovering, global warming is getting worse.
Although not really about global warming, this article is about the Ozone scare that began in the 1980's. When people realized that CFC's were causing....

Decarbonize, Or Suffer The Consequences
According to Wikipedia, Sir Nicholas Stern "was the Chief Economist and Senior Vice-President of the World Bank from 2000 to 2003, and is now a....

Alaskan congressman whines about global warming, told to tell it to the Flat Earth Society
An Alaskan congressman makes an interesting argument against global warming. He calls for greater study and debate on the issues which is a good thing.....

Al Gore To Testify Before U.S. Congress
Al Gore will be testifying before the United States Congress about Climate Change in just a couple more days. There's a petition to sign which....

This entry was posted on Wednesday, October 18th, 2006 at 12:01 am and is filed under Climate Change, Economics. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.